Published On: Thu, Oct 28th, 2010

ASX Clearing System Causing Heartburn for Regulators

The oversight and control of the ASX’s back office clearing operations are emerging as sore points among politicians and regulators.

These are the people who must approve the proposed $8.4 billion takeover of ASX by its Singaporean counterpart.

Clearing, the process of matching up trades with counterparties to make sure settlement takes place, is a lucrative element of ASX’s franchise. If it changed hands with the SGX deal, as is clearly intended, it would possibly be a world first.

As Macquarie Equities analyst Michael Wiblin put it in a note yesterday, “the ASX-SGX case differs from previous cross-border acquisitions such as Nasdaq-OMX and NYSE-EuroNext in that unique components of the nations’ payments systems were not sold”.

Monday’s joint announcement made it clear that ASX and SGX would remain separate legal and locally regulated entities. It also noted that the two would “build on existing distribution and clearing capabilities” without elaborating on exactly what that might mean.

As Mr Wiblin put it, “ASX . . . will end up selling what is effectively Australia’s only equities and derivatives clearing and settlement infrastructure as part of the acquisition. This hasn’t happened to the same degree in an acquisition on an exchange globally as yet.”

Elsewhere, there were greater competition and fragmentation for clearing and settlement than in Australia, he added.

In summary, ASX shareholders are being asked to sell a well-tried local monopoly system that identifies who’s selling and who’s buying in every share and derivatives trade in Australia. Back office experts in Australia are concerned to make sure that information stays onshore if the deal goes through.

“We know that the Singapore authorities are particularly sticky about not allowing information about trading and clearing to reside outside their domicile,” one Australian back office manager said yesterday.

An irony of the transaction is that ASX has recently overhauled its clearing business, which last year earned $31 million, compared for instance with $18m in 2006, to accommodate new competitor Chi-X. It is Chi-X’s looming arrival that is widely considered to be a reason for the merger taking place.

ASX recently renamed the arm ASX Clearing Corporation and, as chief executive Robert Elstone stated in the ASX’s latest annual report, “this will facilitate Chi-X’s application to become a licensed market operator for ASX-quoted securities”.

Source: The Australian

About the Author

-

Displaying 2 Comments
Have Your Say
  1. carl gough says:

    What Mr. Wiblin failed to also point out at other cross boarder mergers is the fate that happened to the NZ stock exchange.

    After the ASX tried to take it over and it was rejected – It became irrelevant – is that the fate that awaits the ASX if it does not get the go ahead?

    Besides, how can the Australian government on the one hand allow and approve a Japanese company to eat away at the profits of its so called national interest and on the other hand stop its national interest from protecting itself – Sounds very much to me like the ASX have their hands tied firmly behind their back while the competition slits their throat – Not a very nice way to treat a national interest…

  2. […] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Cable&Wireless World, carl gough. carl gough said: http://bit.ly/dj42SM OK, Im on the side of the ASX fair and square – Let the merger go ahead or risk "Irrelevancy" like the NZ Exchange […]

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

IRP Journal

IRP Journal

Sponsor

OPINION POLL

Poll results are published in our Weekly Newsletter -->
subscribe
All Rights Reserved WIld Wild Web Limited